8750h Vs 9750h Benchmarks
Price now 840$ Games supported 99% Price at present 824$ Games supported 99% Comparing Cadre i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H processor market type (desktop or notebook), compages, sales start time and toll. Cadre i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H basic parameters such every bit number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. Information on Core i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H compatibility with other figurer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a hereafter figurer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, fifty-fifty without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU ability parameters. Technological solutions and boosted instructions supported by Cadre i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular applied science. Cadre i7-9750H and Cadre i7-8750H technologies aimed at improving security, for instance, by protecting against hacks. Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Cadre i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H are enumerated here. Types, maximum amount and aqueduct quantity of RAM supported past Cadre i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H. Depending on the motherboards, higher retentiveness frequencies may exist supported. General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any. Bachelor interfaces and connections of Core i7-9750H and Cadre i7-8750H integrated GPUs. Maximum display resolutions supported by Cadre i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over unlike interfaces. APIs supported past Core i7-9750H and Cadre i7-8750H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported past Core i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H. Diverse benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if yous find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments department, we usually set bug quickly. Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing criterion for processors past Maxon, authors of Movie theater 4D. Its single cadre version uses simply ane CPU thread to return a futuristic looking motorcycle. 3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, 1 defended to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX packet. TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of deejay partitions, now superseded past VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them existence TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Effect is encryption speed in gigabytes per second. x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable scrap rate output file, which results in improve quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is all the same measured in frames per 2d. x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to shrink a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant scrap rate output file. Its outcome is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second. WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. Information technology contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated information. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second. wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates foursquare roots of outset 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor. Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Cinebench R15 (continuing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later on versions of Cinebench, which utilize more mod variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Unmarried Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) but uses a single processor thread to return a room full of reflective spheres and light sources. Cinebench Release xi.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version. Cinebench R11.v is an sometime benchmark past Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Information technology was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which utilize more mod variants of Movie theatre 4D engine. The Unmarried Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to return a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources. Cinebench Release ten Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is express by 16 in this version. Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of viii different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also 1 separate single-threaded scenario measuring unmarried-cadre performance. Let's come across how skilful Core i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H are for gaming compared with game arrangement requirements. Retrieve that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately. Also, your gaming PC must have a decent plenty GPU to perform well. Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel Core i7-9750H Should you lot still have questions on choice betwixt Core i7-9750H and Core i7-8750H, enquire them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do y'all recollect we are correct or mistaken in our selection? Vote by clicking "Like" button virtually your favourite CPU. We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-9750H by AMD is Phenom II X2 X640 BE, which is slower by 1% and lower by 4 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-9750H: We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-8750H from AMD is Ryzen iii 5300U, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by three positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-8750H: We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the aforementioned market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Here yous can encounter how users charge per unit the processors, as well equally rate them yourself. 969 ratings Intel Core i7-9750H 491 ratings Intel Core i7-8750H Here you tin can ask a question near Core i7-9750H or Core i7-8750H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSIntel Cadre i7-9750H vs Core i7-8750H
General info
Identify in performance rating 530 595 Market segment Laptop Laptop Series Intel Core i7 Intel Core i7 Architecture codename Java Lake Coffee Lake Release date 23 April 2019 (2 years agone) ii April 2018 (four years ago) Launch cost (MSRP) no information $395 Price now $840 $824 (2.1x MSRP) Technical specs
Concrete cores 6 (Hexa-Cadre) six (Hexa-Core) Threads 12 12 Base clock speed two.6 GHz 2.ii GHz Boost clock speed 4.5 GHz four.1 GHz L1 enshroud 64K (per core) 64K (per core) L2 cache 256K (per cadre) 256K (per cadre) L3 cache 12 MB (shared) 9 MB Bit lithography xiv nm fourteen nm Die size 149 mm2 149 mm2 Maximum core temperature 100 °C no information Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C 72 °C 64 bit support + - Windows eleven compatibility + + Unlocked multiplier - - Compatibility
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 one Socket FCBGA1440 FCBGA1440 Thermal pattern power (TDP) 45 Watt 45 Watt Technologies and extensions
Instruction fix extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.one, Intel® SSE4.two, Intel® AVX2 AES-NI + + AVX + + vPro - no data Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) + no data Speed Shift + no data My WiFi + no information Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 no data Hyper-Threading Technology + + TSX - - Idle States + no data Thermal Monitoring + + Flex Memory Access + no data SIPP - - Security technologies
TXT - no data EDB + no information Secure Key + no data MPX + + Identity Protection + + SGX Yeah with Intel® ME no data Os Guard + no information Virtualization technologies
AMD-Five + + VT-d + + VT-ten + + EPT + no data Memory specs
Supported memory types DDR4 DDR4 Maximum memory size 128 GB 64 GB Max retention channels two two Maximum retention bandwidth 41.8 GB/southward no data ECC memory support - - Graphics specifications
Integrated graphics menu Intel UHD Graphics 630 - Max video retention 64 GB - Quick Sync Video + - Articulate Video + - Clear Video HD + - Graphics max frequency ane.15 GHz - InTru 3D + - Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported three - eDP + - DisplayPort + - HDMI + - DVI + - Graphics image quality
4K resolution support + - Max resolution over eDP 4096 ten 2304@60Hz - Max resolution over DisplayPort 4096 ten 2304@60Hz - Max resolution over VGA N/A - Graphics API support
Peripherals
PCIe version 3.0 iii.0 PCI Express lanes 16 sixteen Benchmark functioning
Overall score
Gaming operation
Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 10.31 nine.28 Novelty 23 April 2019 two April 2018 Boost clock speed 4500 4100 Base of operations clock speed 2600 2200
Cast your vote
Competitors of Core i7-9750H past AMD
Competitors of Core i7-8750H by AMD
Similar processor comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/cpu/Core-i7-9750H-vs-Core-i7-8750H
Comments
Post a Comment